Breach of Confidence: Improper Use of Business Information Including Trade Secrets | Benchmark Legal Offices


Last Updated: August 22 2026

Question:If someone misuses a confidential business recipe or proprietary process, can I sue them for breach of confidence in Ontario?

Answer:In Ontario, you may be able to bring a breach of confidence claim if the information had the necessary quality of confidence, it was shared in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence, and the recipient misused it (not necessarily stole it). The Supreme Court in Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574 sets out these core elements, and courts often treat misuse causing detriment as the key wrong. If you are dealing with misused confidential business secrets, Benchmark Legal Offices can assess the facts and help you map next steps with a lawyer & paralegal’s office in Ontario; call (289) 389-8840 to discuss your situation.

Add this website to Google Preferred Sources


Misused Business Secrets

In business, the product recipes, proprietary software, systems and processes, among many other things, may be highly valuable and the misuse of such confidential information may result in considerable harm. The field of tort law includes a cause of action, meaning right to bring a lawsuit, known as breach of confidence which relates to the improper use of information by a person or other business with whom the confidential information was previously shared. Interestingly, where breach of confidence involves information that was previously shared, the wrongfulness arises from improper use of the information rather than theft of the information.

Note: Please contact Benchmark Legal Offices by phone at: (289) 389-8840 to discuss any specific questions that you may have.

The Law

As per the case of Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574, a Supreme Court decision, the elements that must be proven within a breach of confidence case are:

  • The information conveyed was confidential;
  • The information was communicated in confidence; and
  • The information was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.

Specifically, per Lac Minerals Ltd., the Supreme Court said:


I can deal quite briefly with the breach of confidence issue.  I have already indicated that Lac breached a duty of confidence owed to Corona.  The test for whether there has been a breach of confidence is not seriously disputed by the parties.  It consists in establishing three elements:  that the information conveyed was confidential, that it was communicated in confidence, and that it was misused by the party to whom it was communicated.  In Coco v. A. N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd., [1969] R.P.C. 41 (Ch.), Megarry J.  (as he then was) put it as follows at p. 47:

In my judgment, three elements are normally required if, apart from contract, a case of breach of confidence is to succeed.  First, the information itself, in the words of Lord Greene, M.R. in the Saltman case on page 215, must "have the necessary quality of confidence about it."  Secondly, that information must have been imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence.  Thirdly, there must be an unauthorized use of that information to the detriment of the party communicating it . .  .

As a particularly interesting example case, Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods Ltd., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 142 involved the licensing of the recipe for Clamato juice by Duffy-Mott (a company later acquired by Cadbury Schweppes Inc.) to Caesar Canning who then contracted production to FBI Foods Ltd.  After Cadbury Schweppes acquired Duffy-Mott, Caesar Canning was notified of termination of the licensing agreement; however, FBI, who later acquired assets of Caesar Canning, made use of the recipe despite a lack of authorization to do so.

Conclusion

Improper use of secretive information may constitute as the tort of breach of confidence where information was confidential, information was communicated within a confidential context, and the information was then misused by the party that received the communication.

Get a FREE ¼ HOUR CONSULTATION

At
Our Desk Now!
Need Help? Let's Get Started Today

NOTE: Do not send confidential information through the web form.  Use the web form only for your introduction.   Learn Why?
5

NOTE: A multitude of queries featuring “lawyers near me” or “best lawyer in” frequently indicate a desire for prompt and proficient legal assistance instead of a particular job title.  In Ontario, licensed paralegals are governed by the same Law Society that regulates lawyers and are permitted to represent clients in specific litigation matters.  Advocacy, legal assessment, and procedural expertise are fundamental to that function.  Benchmark Legal Offices provides legal representation within its licensed scope, focusing on strategic positioning, evidence preparation, and compelling advocacy aimed at attaining efficient and favorable results for clients.

AR, BN, CA+|EN, DT, ES, FA, FR, GU, HE, HI
IT, KO, PA, PT, RU, TA, TL, UK, UR, VI, ZH
Send a Message to: Benchmark Legal Offices

NOTE: Do not send confidential details about your case.  Using this website does not establish a legal-representative/client relationship.  Use the website for your introduction with Benchmark Legal Offices. 
Privacy Policy & Cookies | Terms of Use Your IP Address is: 216.73.217.2
Benchmark Legal Offices

166 Main Street W.
Grimsby, Ontario,
L3M 1S3

P: (289) 389-8840
E: intakes@benchmarklegal.ca

Hours of Business:

09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
09:00AM - 05:00PM
Monday:
Tuesday:
Wednesday:
Thursday:
Friday:

Book an Appointment







Application Hosted on Microsoft Azure Cloud Web Servers | Analytics by Google
Let’s Encrypt SSL certificate is a service provided by the Internet Security Research Group (ISRG)
All names, logos and/or trademarks are those of their respective owners.

This webpage was served on: September 17 2026 at 04:47:04AM Eastern.

.






Assistive Controls:  |   |  A A A