Yes No Share to Facebook
Selling Haunted Houses
Involves Concerns For Lawsuits Alleging Failure of Disclosure
Last Updated: June 12 2026
Question: Does a home seller in Ontario have to disclose that the house is “haunted”?
Answer: In Ontario, sellers generally must disclose latent defects that make a property dangerous or unfit, but a “haunted” reputation is usually a stigma rather than a physical defect, so liability often turns on what was said or represented during negotiations and whether a buyer can prove measurable harm; for guidance, see 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association et al, 2013 ONSC 5401, and McGrath v MacLean et al., 1979 CanLII 1691. For practical, risk-reducing advice on real estate disclosure, negotiations, and dispute prevention across Ontario, contact Benchmark Legal Offices, a Paralegals and Lawyers’ Office to Serve You, at (289) 389-8840 for a clear plan that helps you close confidently and avoid costly post-sale claims.
Is the Seller of a House Required to Tell the Buyer That the House Is Haunted?
There Are Few Cases Involving Rumoured Haunted Houses; However, It Does Appear That the Manner In Which Rumours Are Spread May Result In Liability For Stating That a House Is Haunted and Thereby Causing a Reduced Property Value.
Understanding the Law Regarding Disclosure Obligations When Selling a House Perceived As Haunted
In the case of 1784773 Ontario Inc. v K-W Labour Association et al, 2013 ONSC 5401, a seller was subsequently sued by the buyer when the seller spread rumours that the house was haunted and that such was a detail the seller failed to previously disclose to the buyer. Subsequently, the buyer brought at a lawsuit and alleged that the haunted house rumour caused reduced realty value due to the stigma arising from such a rumour as well as for the failure of the seller to disclose the haunted status during the sales negotiations with the buyer.
The Law
On the issue of proper disclosure within realty transactions, the law in Canada appears clear that the seller has a duty to disclose to the buyer any latent defects in the property that may pose a danger or make the house uninhabitable. This rule was established by the Ontario Court of Appeal in the case of McGrath v. MacLean et al., 1979 CanLII 1691.
As for the concern involving failure to disclose that a house is haunted, the court in the 1784773 Ontario Inc. case determined that as the statements regarding the haunted status were made jokingly and the Plaintiff was without actual evidence to prove that the house was actually haunted, the case was dismissed. Of course, it is interesting to wonder what the decision of the court would be if some evidence of paranormal activity was available. In another legal dispute regarding a haunted house, the case of Manitoba Free Press v. Nagy, [1907] S.C.R. 340, was reviewed by the Supreme Court of Canada following allegations of that a newspaper for published an article containing suggestions that a vacant house was haunted.
Summary Comment
The chances of getting sued for spreading a rumour that a house is haunted is slim, a former owner of a house should avoid spreading rumours that may adversely affect the value of the property. A seller limits the risk of legal trouble by providing proper disclosure during the selling process and thereafter keeping quiet.
